KronLSTM Study - Recall 2K - Average: leaderboard

KronLSTM (2026): matched research-trained 1.5B models on 100B pretraining tokens, linear and hybrid architectures kept distinct; 2K-context real-world recall tasks. Architecture names do not identify unrelated public Mamba, mLSTM or GDN checkpoints. Accuracy (%); higher is better.

Metric: Accuracy (%). Source: arxiv.org. Saturation forecast: Rough model projection: around 2026. 12 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScoreOverall rank
1KronLSTM Study KronLSTM 1.5B Hybrid (100B tokens)37.4
2KronLSTM Study Mamba-3 1.5B Hybrid (100B tokens)36.96
3KronLSTM Study mLSTM 1.5B Hybrid (100B tokens)36.37
4KronLSTM Study KDA 1.5B Hybrid (100B tokens)36.01
5KronLSTM Study GDN-2 1.5B Hybrid (100B tokens)35.85
6KronLSTM Study GDN 1.5B Hybrid (100B tokens)35.27
7KronLSTM Study KronLSTM 1.5B Linear (100B tokens)30.31
8KronLSTM Study GDN 1.5B Linear (100B tokens)29.81
9KronLSTM Study GDN-2 1.5B Linear (100B tokens)29.39
10KronLSTM Study KDA 1.5B Linear (100B tokens)29.17

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=kronlstm-study-recall-2k-average · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-10-21.