KronLSTM Study - Language - PIQA: leaderboard

KronLSTM (2026): matched research-trained 1.5B models on 100B pretraining tokens, linear and hybrid architectures kept distinct; zero/few-shot downstream task protocol from the paper. Architecture names do not identify unrelated public Mamba, mLSTM or GDN checkpoints. Accuracy (%); higher is better.

Metric: Accuracy (%). Source: arxiv.org. Saturation forecast: Rough model projection: around 2026. 12 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScoreOverall rank
1KronLSTM Study Mamba-3 1.5B Hybrid (100B tokens)74.1
2KronLSTM Study KronLSTM 1.5B Hybrid (100B tokens)73.78
3KronLSTM Study GDN 1.5B Linear (100B tokens)73.61
4KronLSTM Study KronLSTM 1.5B Linear (100B tokens)73.45
5KronLSTM Study KDA 1.5B Linear (100B tokens)73.39
6KronLSTM Study mLSTM 1.5B Linear (100B tokens)73.07
7KronLSTM Study Mamba-3 1.5B Linear (100B tokens)73.01
8KronLSTM Study GDN-2 1.5B Linear (100B tokens)72.96
9KronLSTM Study GDN-2 1.5B Hybrid (100B tokens)72.91
10KronLSTM Study mLSTM 1.5B Hybrid (100B tokens)72.8

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=kronlstm-study-language-piqa · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-10-21.