K-Bench - Risk: leaderboard

The risk-handling section of K-Bench's clinician rubric under the Default v1 prompt, scoring how a response manages danger to self or others. Published reasoning settings remain separate. Higher is better. Source: arxiv.org/abs/2609.15855.

Metric: Risk Score (%, Default v1 prompt). Source: arxiv.org. Saturation forecast: Estimated already saturated. 62 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScoreOverall rank
1Claude Fable 5 (High)96.11#20 (Claude Fable 5)
2GPT-5.5 (Medium)96.02#33 (GPT-5.5)
3GPT-5.5 (Low)95.51#33 (GPT-5.5)
4GPT-5.6 Sol (Non-reasoning)95.04#22 (GPT-5.6 Sol)
5GPT-5.2 (Non-reasoning)94.71#115 (GPT-5.2)
6GPT-5.6 Terra (Medium)94.59#40 (GPT-5.6 Terra)
7GPT-5.2 (High)94.46#115 (GPT-5.2)
8GPT-5.6 Terra (Non-reasoning)94.35#40 (GPT-5.6 Terra)
9Claude Opus 4.8 (Low)94.34#39 (Claude Opus 4.8)
10GPT-5.6 Sol (Medium)94.21#22 (GPT-5.6 Sol)
11GPT-5.5 (Non-reasoning)94.12#33 (GPT-5.5)
12GPT-5.6 Luna (Non-reasoning)94.05#79 (GPT-5.6 Luna)
13Kimi K2.594#152
14GPT-5.4 (Non-reasoning)93.93#83 (GPT-5.4)
15GPT-5.4 (Low)93.72#83 (GPT-5.4)

No result here: #3 Claude Opus 5.5, #6 GPT-6 Astra, #7 GPT-6.1 Sol.

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=k-bench-risk · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-11-05.