K-Bench: leaderboard

Clinically calibrated evaluation of high-risk mental-health vignettes against a clinician-agreed rubric. This board uses the Default v1 prompt and preserves each published reasoning setting; Therapeutic v0 is a separate board. Higher is better. Source: arxiv.org/abs/2609.15855.

Metric: Overall (%, Default v1 prompt). Source: arxiv.org. Saturation forecast: Estimated already saturated. 62 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScoreOverall rank
1GPT-5.5 (Low)98.96#33 (GPT-5.5)
2GPT-5.5 (Medium)98.92#33 (GPT-5.5)
3Kimi K2.598.63#152
4GPT-5.2 (Non-reasoning)98.59#115 (GPT-5.2)
5Claude Opus 4.8 (Low)98.58#39 (Claude Opus 4.8)
6Claude Fable 5 (High)98.57#20 (Claude Fable 5)
7GPT-5.2 (High)98.54#115 (GPT-5.2)
8Claude Fable 5 (Low)98.47#20 (Claude Fable 5)
9Kimi K2.698.43#113
10GPT-5.4 (Non-reasoning)98.41#83 (GPT-5.4)
11GPT-5.4 (Low)98.39#83 (GPT-5.4)
12GLM-5.3 Flash (Max)98.36#77 (GLM-5.3 Flash)
13GLM-5.3 Flash (Low)98.36#77 (GLM-5.3 Flash)
14Claude Haiku 4.5 (High)98.35#287 (Claude Haiku 4.5)
15Claude Opus 4.8 (High)98.34#39 (Claude Opus 4.8)

No result here: #3 Claude Opus 5.5, #6 GPT-6 Astra, #7 GPT-6.1 Sol.

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=k-bench · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-11-05.