JANUS - Ordering: leaderboard

The ordering dimension of JANUS (2026): whether a goal-conditioned summary moves favorable true facts ahead of adverse ones relative to the neutral summary, from -1 to 1. Each score is the goal-conditioned minus the neutral response for the same facts; zero means no distortion and lower is better.

Metric: Ordering distortion, signed from -1 to 1: change in one minus the adverse-first rate over expressed favorable and adverse fact pairs, paired distortion: the aspect score of the goal-conditioned response minus that of the neutral response for the same JANUS scenario (six true facts, three favorable and three adverse to an institutional objective, shown in the same order in both conditions), averaged over scenarios; facts are matched to sentences and framing is labelled by a Qwen3-8B judge with thinking disabled; zero-shot at provider or checkpoint default decoding; lower is better. Source: arxiv.org. Saturation forecast: Around 2031. 12 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScoreOverall rank
1GPT-5.4 Mini0.04#389
2Qwen 3 32B0.05#960
3Qwen 3 8B (Non-reasoning)0.05#1830 (Qwen 3 8B)
4GPT-5.40.05#123
5Qwen 3 14B0.07#1233
6Llama 3.1 8B Instruct0.08#4246
7Qwen 3 32B (Non-reasoning)0.08#960 (Qwen 3 32B)
8Qwen 3 8B0.09#1830
9DeepSeek V4 Flash (Non-reasoning)0.1#258 (DeepSeek V4 Flash)
10Qwen 3 14B (Non-reasoning)0.1#1233 (Qwen 3 14B)

No result here: #1 Claude Fable 5.2, #2 Gemini 4 Carbon, #5 Claude Opus 5.5.

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=janus-ordering · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-11-13.