IWC-Bench: leaderboard

Interactive web-application generation judged from a software-testing perspective: an agent tester explores the generated app and scores aesthetics, usability, functionality, content and visual alignment; the total is standardized within the 17-model pool (z-score), main judge Claude-Opus-4.8. Each row names its harness (Claude Code or Codex) and reasoning effort in the paper. Higher is better. Source: arxiv.org/abs/2609.15387.

Metric: Standardized total score (z, judge Claude-Opus-4.8). Source: arxiv.org. Saturation forecast: Around July 2027. 17 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScoreOverall rank
1Claude Opus 51.33#16
2GPT-5.6 Sol1.08#22
3Qwen 3.8 Max0.97#34
4Kimi K30.97#35
5Hy4 preview0.91#45
6Claude Opus 4.80.76#39
7Grok 4.50.75#54
8GPT-5.50.47#33
9Claude Opus 4.7-0.26#51
10GLM-5.2-0.31#80
11DeepSeek V4 Flash-0.35#155
12Hy3-0.59#100
13Qwen 3.7 Max-0.91#85
14GLM-5.1-0.94#109
15Kimi K2.7 Code-1.31#95

No result here: #3 Claude Opus 5.5, #6 GPT-6 Astra, #7 GPT-6.1 Sol.

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=iwc-bench · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-11-05.