Ironbee Raw Code Review - Full - RECALL: leaderboard

Ironbee raw code review (2026): standalone model review of real pull requests, three repeated runs. Full uses 50 PRs and Frontier 10 PRs; no cohort pooling. Model-specific requested tiers remain explicit; precision, recall, F1 and F2 are separate metrics. Aggregated source fractions are multiplied by 100, with full precision retained. RECALL (%).

Metric: RECALL (%). Source: raw.githubusercontent.com. Saturation forecast: Rough model projection: around 2026. 52 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScoreOverall rank
1Ironbee Study claude-opus-5 - xhigh tier79.75
2Ironbee Study claude-opus-5 - default tier76.58
3Ironbee Study claude-opus-5.5 - xhigh tier75.74
4Ironbee Study claude-sonnet-5.5 - xhigh tier75.32
5Ironbee Study claude-sonnet-5.5 - default tier73.42
6Ironbee Study claude-opus-5 - low tier73.21
7Ironbee Study mistral-large-4 - low tier73.21
8Ironbee Study grok-4.7 - xhigh tier71.73
9Ironbee Study claude-sonnet-5.5 - low tier71.52
10Ironbee Study claude-opus-5.5 - default tier71.52

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=ironbee-raw-code-review-full-recall · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-10-21.