Interpretive Canons (BVerfG): leaderboard
Metric: Mean positive-class F1 over the seven binary subtasks (%; sentence-level classification of reading criteria, argument support and the four interpretive canons of Larenz in German Federal Constitutional Court decisions; expert-written prompt with worked examples (the same for every model), reasoning models at temperature 1.0; decision-disjoint held-out test split (60% of each subtask, 1:3 positives to negatives)). Source: arxiv.org. Saturation forecast: Around December 2026. 4 models tracked.
Top models
| # | Model | Score |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | DeepSeek V4 Pro | 75.2 |
| 2 | MiniMax-M3 | 75.2 |
| 3 | DeepSeek V4 Flash | 73.5 |
| 4 | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | 72.7 |
Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=interpretive-canons-bverfg · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-09-26.