InteractBench - Hard - pass@1: leaderboard

InteractBench (arXiv 2608.29632v1, Table 2): interactive competitive-programming tasks where the submitted program must query a judge program under a protocol and query budget. pass@1 estimated from 10 samples per task at temperature 0.8 on hard problems, in percent; higher is better. Thinking and non-thinking runs of one checkpoint are separate rows.

Metric: pass@1 (%; n=10 samples per task). Source: arxiv.org. Saturation forecast: Around February 2027. 16 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScoreOverall rank
1Gemini 3 Pro (Preview)36.7#71
2GPT-5.2 (Thinking)34#115 (GPT-5.2)
3DeepSeek V3.2 (Thinking)10.4#210 (DeepSeek V3.2)
4Gemini 2.5 Pro9.2#159
5GPT-OSS-120B7.8#346
6DeepSeek V3.2 (Non-reasoning)2.4#210 (DeepSeek V3.2)
7GPT-OSS-20B2.1#523
8Claude Opus 4.5 (Thinking)2.1#87 (Claude Opus 4.5)
9Qwen 3 30B A3B 2507 (Thinking)1.2#379
10Gemini 2.5 Flash0.9#255
11Qwen 3 32B (Thinking)0.9#449 (Qwen 3 32B)
12GPT-4.10.3#258
13Qwen 3 32B (Non-reasoning)0#449 (Qwen 3 32B)
14DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B0#614
15Qwen 3 14B (Non-reasoning)0#542 (Qwen 3 14B)

No result here: #3 Claude Opus 5.5, #6 GPT-6 Astra, #7 GPT-6.1 Sol.

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=interactbench-hard-pass-1 · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-11-05.