Infrathon Mean Rank Score - Training System: leaderboard

Infrathon Mean Rank Score - Training System: Mean per-task rank score (0-100). Infrathon arXiv 2611.11995v1 Figure 5: source-printed mean rank scores (0-100, higher better), not task raw score. Six panels: training operator 3, module 2, system 5; inference operator 8, module 3, system 4 tasks. Best valid private-test score within budget is ranked per task; operator 12h, module/system 24h. Claude Code for Opus 5.5, Codex CLI for the five others; source says max reasoning for all. Exact primary SVG bytes and companion paper bytes pinned. Dataset card HTTP 401 does not erase the public paper results. Native Flash identity preserved; no dated backend inferred.

Metric: Mean per-task rank score (0-100). Source: arxiv.org. Saturation forecast: Around February 2027. 6 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScoreOverall rank
1Claude Opus 5.5 (Max)92#5 (Claude Opus 5.5)
2GPT-6 Astra (Max)72#6 (GPT-6 Astra)
3GPT-6.1 Sol (Max)52#10 (GPT-6.1 Sol)
4Qwen 3.8 Flash (Max)44#109 (Qwen 3.8 Flash)
5DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Max)32#58 (DeepSeek V4.1 Flash)
6GLM-5.3 Flash (Max)8#119 (GLM-5.3 Flash)

No result here: #1 Claude Fable 5.2, #2 Gemini 4 Carbon.

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=infrathon-mean-rank-score-training-system · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-11-12.