IndustryBench - Standards and Terminology: leaderboard

Metric: Final (SV) score (out of 3): mean 0-3 rubric score from a Qwen3-Max judge against the reference answer, set to 0 for any answer with a safety violation against the source standard; closed-book, zero-shot, provider-default decoding, over the 610 items of the 2,049 Chinese industrial procurement QA items of IndustryBench grounded in Chinese national standards (GB/T) in the Standards and Terminology capability dimension (national standard citation, industry terms and technical specifications; default non-reasoning runs); higher is better. Source: arxiv.org. Saturation forecast: Around December 2027. 17 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScore
1Gemini 3.1 Pro (Preview)1.76
2Qwen 3.6 Plus (Non-reasoning)1.65
3Claude Opus 4.61.62
4Kimi K2.5 (Non-reasoning)1.61
5GPT-5.4 (Non-reasoning)1.57
6Qwen 3.5 Plus (Non-reasoning)1.55
7Qwen 3.5 397B A17B (Non-reasoning)1.55
8Qwen 3.5 122B A10B (Non-reasoning)1.52
9GLM-5 (Non-reasoning)1.5
10GPT-5.2 (Non-reasoning)1.48
11Claude Sonnet 4.61.41
12MiniMax-M2.51.39
13Qwen 3.5 27B (Non-reasoning)1.36
14Qwen 3.5 35B A3B (Non-reasoning)1.21
15Qwen 3 235B A22B (Non-reasoning)1.16

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=industrybench-standards-and-terminology · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-10-07.