IndustryBench - Selection and Substitution: leaderboard

Metric: Final (SV) score (out of 3): mean 0-3 rubric score from a Qwen3-Max judge against the reference answer, set to 0 for any answer with a safety violation against the source standard; closed-book, zero-shot, provider-default decoding, over the 649 items of the 2,049 Chinese industrial procurement QA items of IndustryBench grounded in Chinese national standards (GB/T) in the Selection and Substitution capability dimension (model selection, substitution and performance comparison; default non-reasoning runs); higher is better. Source: arxiv.org. Saturation forecast: Around January 2027. 17 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScore
1GPT-5.4 (Non-reasoning)2.19
2Claude Opus 4.62.12
3Gemini 3.1 Pro (Preview)2.11
4Qwen 3.5 Plus (Non-reasoning)2.08
5Qwen 3.5 397B A17B (Non-reasoning)2.08
6Qwen 3.6 Plus (Non-reasoning)2.07
7GPT-5.2 (Non-reasoning)2.03
8Qwen 3.5 122B A10B (Non-reasoning)2.03
9Kimi K2.5 (Non-reasoning)2
10Qwen 3.5 27B (Non-reasoning)1.92
11Claude Sonnet 4.61.89
12MiniMax-M2.51.85
13Qwen 3.5 35B A3B (Non-reasoning)1.8
14GLM-5 (Non-reasoning)1.78
15Qwen 3 235B A22B (Non-reasoning)1.55

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=industrybench-selection-and-substitution · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-10-07.