IndustryBench - Quality and Metrology: leaderboard

Metric: Final (SV) score (out of 3): mean 0-3 rubric score from a Qwen3-Max judge against the reference answer, set to 0 for any answer with a safety violation against the source standard; closed-book, zero-shot, provider-default decoding, over the 93 items of the 2,049 Chinese industrial procurement QA items of IndustryBench grounded in Chinese national standards (GB/T) in the Quality and Metrology capability dimension (testing methods, quality metrics and measurement standards; default non-reasoning runs); higher is better. Source: arxiv.org. Saturation forecast: Around January 2027. 17 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScore
1Gemini 3.1 Pro (Preview)2.26
2Kimi K2.5 (Non-reasoning)2.22
3GPT-5.4 (Non-reasoning)2.16
4Qwen 3.6 Plus (Non-reasoning)2.16
5Qwen 3.5 397B A17B (Non-reasoning)2.15
6Qwen 3.5 122B A10B (Non-reasoning)2.15
7Qwen 3.5 27B (Non-reasoning)2.13
8Claude Opus 4.62.1
9GPT-5.2 (Non-reasoning)2.08
10Qwen 3.5 Plus (Non-reasoning)2.07
11Qwen 3.5 35B A3B (Non-reasoning)2.05
12GLM-5 (Non-reasoning)2.04
13Claude Sonnet 4.62.04
14MiniMax-M2.51.87
15Qwen 3 235B A22B (Non-reasoning)1.79

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=industrybench-quality-and-metrology · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-10-07.