IndicBankBench - Third-Party Request Refusal: leaderboard

The third-party axis of the capability and refusal domain of IndicBankBench (Paul et al., 2026): 13 requests involving another party that the assistant should decline for the right reason. Percentage of cases passed in all three runs (strict pass^3), under deterministic safety and tool-use checks and a GLM-5.2 response judge; higher is better.

Metric: Strict pass^3 (%; 13 cases passed out of the 13 cases of the third-party capability and refusal axis (requests touching another customer); each case run three times at temperature 0.7 with the stated reasoning modes; a case passes only when all three runs pass the deterministic safety and tool-use gates and the GLM-5.2 response judge; scripted Indian retail-banking conversations over deterministic mock tools). Source: arxiv.org. Saturation forecast: Estimated already saturated. 11 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScoreOverall rank
1DeepSeek V4 Pro (0813) (Max)100#81 (DeepSeek V4 Pro (0813))
2Gemini 3.8 Flash92.31#36
3Grok 4.6 (High)92.31#44 (Grok 4.6)
4DeepSeek V4 Flash (0731) (Max)92.31#136 (DeepSeek V4 Flash (0731))
5GLM-5.3 Flash (High)92.31#119 (GLM-5.3 Flash)
6Gemma 4 31B (IT) (Thinking)84.62#343 (Gemma 4 31B (IT))
7gemma-4-26B-A4B-it (Thinking)84.62
8MiniMax-M376.92#265
9Claude Opus 5 (Max)76.92#20 (Claude Opus 5)
10Gemma 4 E4B (IT) (Thinking)38.46

No result here: #1 Claude Fable 5.2, #2 Gemini 4 Carbon, #5 Claude Opus 5.5.

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=indicbankbench-third-party-request-refusal · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-11-12.