IndicBankBench - Out-of-Scope Refusal: leaderboard

The out-of-scope refusal axis of IndicBankBench (Paul et al., 2026): 40 requests outside retail-banking self-service that the assistant should decline for the right reason. Percentage of cases passed in all three runs (strict pass^3), under deterministic safety and tool-use checks and a GLM-5.2 response judge; higher is better.

Metric: Strict pass^3 (%; 40 cases passed out of the 40 cases of the out-of-scope refusal axis; each case run three times at temperature 0.7 with the stated reasoning modes; a case passes only when all three runs pass the deterministic safety and tool-use gates and the GLM-5.2 response judge; scripted Indian retail-banking conversations over deterministic mock tools). Source: arxiv.org. Saturation forecast: Around September 2027. 11 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScoreOverall rank
1Grok 4.6 (High)77.5#44 (Grok 4.6)
2MiniMax-M372.5#265
3DeepSeek V4 Pro (0813) (Max)72.5#81 (DeepSeek V4 Pro (0813))
4Claude Opus 5 (Max)70#20 (Claude Opus 5)
5DeepSeek V4 Flash (0731) (Max)67.5#136 (DeepSeek V4 Flash (0731))
6Gemma 4 31B (IT) (Thinking)67.5#343 (Gemma 4 31B (IT))
7GLM-5.3 Flash (High)62.5#119 (GLM-5.3 Flash)
8gemma-4-26B-A4B-it (Thinking)57.5
9Gemini 3.8 Flash52.5#36
10Gemma 4 E4B (IT) (Thinking)52.5

No result here: #1 Claude Fable 5.2, #2 Gemini 4 Carbon, #5 Claude Opus 5.5.

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=indicbankbench-out-of-scope-refusal · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-11-12.