IndicBankBench: leaderboard

IndicBankBench (Paul et al., 2026) tests language-model assistants on 799 multi-turn Indian retail-banking conversations with stateful mock tools, covering five operational domains and a capability and refusal domain. Each case runs three times and passes only if every run clears deterministic safety and tool-use checks and a GLM-5.2 response judge; the score is the percentage of cases passed (strict pass^3), higher is better.

Metric: Strict pass^3 (%; cases passed out of all 799 cases (twelve behavioral axes and eight capability and refusal axes); each case run three times at temperature 0.7 with the stated reasoning modes; a case passes only when all three runs pass the deterministic safety and tool-use gates and the GLM-5.2 response judge; scripted Indian retail-banking conversations over deterministic mock tools). Source: arxiv.org. Saturation forecast: Around 2029. 11 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScoreOverall rank
1DeepSeek V4 Pro (0813) (Max)58.2#81 (DeepSeek V4 Pro (0813))
2Grok 4.6 (High)58.07#44 (Grok 4.6)
3Claude Opus 5 (Max)57.7#20 (Claude Opus 5)
4GLM-5.3 Flash (High)56.82#119 (GLM-5.3 Flash)
5DeepSeek V4 Flash (0731) (Max)54.19#136 (DeepSeek V4 Flash (0731))
6Gemma 4 31B (IT) (Thinking)54.07#343 (Gemma 4 31B (IT))
7Gemini 3.8 Flash53.32#36
8MiniMax-M348.19#265
9gemma-4-26B-A4B-it (Thinking)47.43
10Gemma 4 E4B (IT) (Thinking)43.68

No result here: #1 Claude Fable 5.2, #2 Gemini 4 Carbon, #5 Claude Opus 5.5.

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=indicbankbench · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-11-12.