IHBench - Task Fulfillment: leaderboard

IHBench (Salimi et al., 2026) interrupts spoken-dialogue models mid-utterance at 428 scripted points in 45 structured-workflow voice conversations across ten domains, with the user's turn given as audio; a GPT-5.4-mini judge (high reasoning) scores the model's next turn, averaged over three epochs. Score is the percentage of interruptions where the judge prefers the model's turn over GPT-4o Audio's for advancing the workflow, so 50 means parity with that reference; higher is better.

Metric: Win rate against GPT-4o Audio (%; share of 428 interruption points where a GPT-5.4-mini judge (high reasoning) prefers the model's next turn for advancing the workflow, audio input, mean of three epochs). Source: arxiv.org. Saturation forecast: Around February 2027. 27 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScoreOverall rank
1Gemini 2.5 Flash (Thinking)58.6#452 (Gemini 2.5 Flash)
2Gemini 3.1 Pro (Preview)58.2#91
3Gemini 2.5 Pro52.6#262
4Gemma 4 12B (Reasoning)51.1#927 (Gemma 4 12B)
5Gemma 4 12B (Non-reasoning)50.5#927 (Gemma 4 12B)
6Gemini 2.5 Flash (Non-reasoning)48.8#452 (Gemini 2.5 Flash)
7Voxtral-Small-24B-250730.8#1291
8Qwen3 Omni 30B A3B Instruct30.4#902
9Qwen2.5-Omni-7B18.1#1797
10Phi-4 Multimodal Instruct10.4#3914

No result here: #1 Claude Fable 5.2, #2 Gemini 4 Carbon, #5 Claude Opus 5.5.

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=ihbench-task-fulfillment · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-11-12.