IHBench - Recovery Quality - Pushback: leaderboard

IHBench (Salimi et al., 2026) interrupts spoken-dialogue models mid-utterance at 428 scripted points in 45 structured-workflow voice conversations across ten domains, with the user's turn given as audio; a GPT-5.4-mini judge (high reasoning) scores the model's next turn, averaged over three epochs. This board is the 105 interruptions in which the user pushes back on what the assistant said, scored by the percentage of turns meeting every recovery criterion; higher is better.

Metric: Recovery pass rate (%; 105 pushbacks, every type-specific criterion met, GPT-5.4-mini judge (high reasoning), audio input, mean of three epochs). Source: arxiv.org. Saturation forecast: Around February 2027. 27 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScoreOverall rank
1Gemini 2.5 Flash (Thinking)75#452 (Gemini 2.5 Flash)
2Gemini 3.1 Pro (Preview)71#91
3Qwen3 Omni 30B A3B Instruct69#902
4Gemini 2.5 Flash (Non-reasoning)67#452 (Gemini 2.5 Flash)
5Gemini 2.5 Pro66#262
6Voxtral-Small-24B-250761#1291
7Gemma 4 12B (Non-reasoning)60#927 (Gemma 4 12B)
8Gemma 4 12B (Reasoning)58#927 (Gemma 4 12B)
9Qwen2.5-Omni-7B49#1797
10Phi-4 Multimodal Instruct44#3914

No result here: #1 Claude Fable 5.2, #2 Gemini 4 Carbon, #5 Claude Opus 5.5.

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=ihbench-recovery-quality-pushback · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-11-12.