IHBench - Recovery Quality - Normal: leaderboard

IHBench (Salimi et al., 2026) interrupts spoken-dialogue models mid-utterance at 428 scripted points in 45 structured-workflow voice conversations across ten domains, with the user's turn given as audio; a GPT-5.4-mini judge (high reasoning) scores the model's next turn, averaged over three epochs. This board is the 81 ordinary cut-ins, scored by the percentage of turns meeting every recovery criterion; higher is better.

Metric: Recovery pass rate (%; 81 normal cut-ins, every type-specific criterion met, GPT-5.4-mini judge (high reasoning), audio input, mean of three epochs). Source: arxiv.org. Saturation forecast: Around February 2027. 27 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScoreOverall rank
1Gemini 3.1 Pro (Preview)82#91
2Qwen3 Omni 30B A3B Instruct80#902
3Gemini 2.5 Flash (Non-reasoning)76#452 (Gemini 2.5 Flash)
4Gemini 2.5 Pro75#262
5Gemini 2.5 Flash (Thinking)75#452 (Gemini 2.5 Flash)
6Voxtral-Small-24B-250774#1291
7Gemma 4 12B (Reasoning)66#927 (Gemma 4 12B)
8Qwen2.5-Omni-7B65#1797
9Gemma 4 12B (Non-reasoning)63#927 (Gemma 4 12B)
10Phi-4 Multimodal Instruct52#3914

No result here: #1 Claude Fable 5.2, #2 Gemini 4 Carbon, #5 Claude Opus 5.5.

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=ihbench-recovery-quality-normal · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-11-12.