IHBench - Recovery Quality - Impatient: leaderboard

IHBench (Salimi et al., 2026) interrupts spoken-dialogue models mid-utterance at 428 scripted points in 45 structured-workflow voice conversations across ten domains, with the user's turn given as audio; a GPT-5.4-mini judge (high reasoning) scores the model's next turn, averaged over three epochs. This board is the 84 impatient interruptions, scored by the percentage of turns meeting every recovery criterion; higher is better.

Metric: Recovery pass rate (%; 84 impatient interruptions, every type-specific criterion met, GPT-5.4-mini judge (high reasoning), audio input, mean of three epochs). Source: arxiv.org. Saturation forecast: Around October 2027. 27 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScoreOverall rank
1Gemini 2.5 Pro69#262
2Gemini 3.1 Pro (Preview)66#91
3Qwen3 Omni 30B A3B Instruct63#902
4Gemini 2.5 Flash (Non-reasoning)58#452 (Gemini 2.5 Flash)
5Gemini 2.5 Flash (Thinking)58#452 (Gemini 2.5 Flash)
6Phi-4 Multimodal Instruct56#3914
7Qwen2.5-Omni-7B53#1797
8Voxtral-Small-24B-250753#1291
9Gemma 4 12B (Reasoning)52#927 (Gemma 4 12B)
10Gemma 4 12B (Non-reasoning)51#927 (Gemma 4 12B)

No result here: #1 Claude Fable 5.2, #2 Gemini 4 Carbon, #5 Claude Opus 5.5.

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=ihbench-recovery-quality-impatient · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-11-12.