IdeaAMBIG - Clarification Action Generation - Real-World: leaderboard
IdeaAMBIG (arXiv 2609.10539v1, Table 1): the model is given the annotated defect and proposes an action that would obtain the missing information, on real-world specifications from GitHub issues and reproducibility reports. Score is Macro Clarification Action Success Rate (relevant, sufficient, no unsupported assumptions; Claude Opus 4.8 evaluator), in percent; higher is better. Zero-shot fixed prompts at temperature 0.
Metric: Macro Clarification Action Success Rate (%). Source: arxiv.org. Saturation forecast: Around August 2027. 13 models tracked.
Top models
| # | Model | Score | Overall rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | GPT-5.6 Sol | 80.6 | #22 |
| 2 | Claude Sonnet 5 | 76.8 | #65 |
| 3 | Qwen 3.5 397B A17B | 72 | #154 |
| 4 | Gemini 3.1 Pro (Preview) | 68.9 | #64 |
| 5 | DeepSeek R1 0528 | 68 | #232 |
| 6 | Gemma 4 31B (IT) | 67.7 | #178 |
| 7 | Qwen 3.5 9B | 64.6 | #391 |
| 8 | GLM-5.2 | 63.6 | #80 |
| 9 | DeepSeek V3.2 | 62.9 | #210 |
| 10 | Qwen 3 32B | 61.9 | #449 |
| 11 | Kimi K3 | 60.6 | #35 |
| 12 | Qwen 3 8B | 53.8 | #678 |
| 13 | GPT-OSS-120B | 53.4 | #346 |
No result here: #3 Claude Opus 5.5, #6 GPT-6 Astra, #7 GPT-6.1 Sol.
Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=ideaambig-clarification-action-generation-real-world · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-11-05.