HyperGVL - Understanding: leaderboard
Metric: Average accuracy (%) over the six understanding tasks (vertex, hyperedge, degree- and order-specified counting, neighbors, order-filtered neighbors), 7,000 questions per task (200 problems on synthetic and real-world hypergraphs, each posed in 35 textual, visual and combined hypergraph representations), accuracy (%) averaged over the representations, temperature 0.8, top-p 0.95; higher is better. Source: arxiv.org. Saturation forecast: Around January 2027. 12 models tracked.
Top models
| # | Model | Score |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Gemini 3 Flash | 89.72 |
| 2 | Gemma 3 12B | 63.53 |
| 3 | InternVL3-8B | 44.96 |
| 4 | Qwen 2.5 VL 7B Instruct | 42.39 |
Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=hypergvl-understanding · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-10-07.