Hy-MultiTurn - Strict Accuracy: leaderboard

The strict accuracy of Hy-MultiTurn (Tencent Hunyuan, 2026): the percent of its 209 long Chinese multi-turn dialogue tasks whose final response satisfies every checklist item, averaged over three rolls and three LLM judges. Higher is better.

Metric: Strict accuracy (%): share of tasks whose every checklist item is satisfied, 209 long Chinese multi-turn dialogues (12 to 76 turns), three rolls per task averaged, three LLM judges (GPT-5.2, Qwen 3.6, DeepSeek-V4 Pro) averaged, a deterministic checker for precise execution; higher is better. Source: arxiv.org. Saturation forecast: Around July 2027. 22 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScoreOverall rank
1GPT-5.5 (High)41.1#49 (GPT-5.5)
2Grok 4.5 (High)39.9#82 (Grok 4.5)
3Kimi K3 (Max)35.9#54 (Kimi K3)
4GPT-5.4 (High)35.5#123 (GPT-5.4)
5Claude Opus 4.6 (High)32.7#102 (Claude Opus 4.6)
6Gemini 3.1 Pro (Preview) (High)32.4#94 (Gemini 3.1 Pro (Preview))
7Claude Opus 4.7 (High)30.4#79 (Claude Opus 4.7)
8Kimi K2.625.9#178
9Doubao-Seed-2.1-Pro (High)25.5
10Hy3 (High)24.4#195 (Hy3)
11Kimi K2.5 (Thinking)21#256 (Kimi K2.5)
12Kimi K2.6 (Non-reasoning)20#178 (Kimi K2.6)
13Qwen 3.6 Plus (Thinking)19.5#222 (Qwen 3.6 Plus)
14Kimi K2.5 (Non-reasoning)17.9#256 (Kimi K2.5)
15Hy3-preview (High)13.8#316 (Hy3-preview)

No result here: #1 Claude Fable 5.2, #2 Gemini 4 Carbon, #5 Claude Opus 5.5.

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=hy-multiturn-strict-accuracy · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-11-13.