HoloCount - Relative Canonical Orientation: leaderboard

Counting the objects inside a region named by a canonical direction, such as the bottom-left quadrant: a subset of HoloCount (Meituan, 2026), a visual counting benchmark for multimodal LLMs. Models answer with a single integer, zero-shot; exact-match accuracy in percent, higher is better.

Metric: Accuracy (%; exact-match accuracy of the single integer count a multimodal model returns zero-shot for an image and a counting question, with a strict integer-only system prompt; counting objects inside a region named by a canonical direction such as the bottom-left quadrant (84 questions); higher is better). Source: arxiv.org. Saturation forecast: Not forecast. 30 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScoreOverall rank
1Qwen 3.5 397B A17B82.1#246
2Qwen 3.5 27B82.1#359
3Gemini 3.1 Pro (Preview)81#94
4Qwen 3.5 35B A3B78.6#482
5Gemini 3 Flash (Preview)78.6#144
6Qwen 3.5 122B A10B77.4#331
7Qwen 3.5 9B76.2#803
8Kimi K2.576.2#256
9Kimi K2.676.2#178
10GPT-5.573.8#49
11Qwen 3 VL 32B Instruct72.6#585
12Qwen 3.5 4B71.4#1175
13Qwen 2.5 VL 32B Instruct71.4#1053
14Claude Opus 4.769#79
15Claude Sonnet 4.667.9#161

No result here: #1 Claude Fable 5.2, #2 Gemini 4 Carbon, #5 Claude Opus 5.5.

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=holocount-relative-canonical-orientation · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-11-13.