HelpBench - Platform Actions: leaderboard

HelpBench (2026) asks LLMs real-world digital privacy, safety and security help-seeking questions and scores each answer against an expert-written rubric of factual and delivery criteria, applied by a Gemini 2.5 Pro auto-rater and averaged over five responses. This board is the rubric score in percent on questions about platform or third-party safety actions gone awry, such as bans and suspensions; higher is better.

Metric: Platform Actions topic (platform or third-party safety actions gone awry, such as bans and suspensions) rubric score (%): points for met positive criteria and avoided negative criteria (factual criteria written per question by privacy, safety and security experts, plus shared delivery criteria) over the maximum points, applied by a Gemini 2.5 Pro auto-rater at temperature 0; chat versions with default parameters, mean of five responses per question; higher is better. Source: arxiv.org. Saturation forecast: Estimated already saturated. 18 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScoreOverall rank
1GPT-5 Chat89#444
2GPT-5.386#197
3Claude Opus 4.685#102
4Claude Sonnet 4.684#161
5GPT-4.184#495
6Qwen 3.6 Plus84#222
7Grok 483#307
8Claude Sonnet 483#400
9Gemini 3.1 Pro (Preview)81#94
10Gemini 3 Flash81#164
11DeepSeek V3.2 (Non-reasoning)81#406 (DeepSeek V3.2)
12GLM-5.180#179
13Gemini 2.5 Pro79#266
14Grok 4.2079#297
15DeepSeek V3.1 (Non-reasoning)79#497 (DeepSeek V3.1)

No result here: #1 Claude Fable 5.2, #2 Gemini 4 Carbon, #5 Claude Opus 5.5.

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=helpbench-platform-actions · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-11-13.