HELM TORR - Wikitq - Robustness: leaderboard

HELM ToRR (release v1.0.0) robustness on WikiTableQuestions (question answering over Wikipedia tables; 60 instances): per instance, 1 minus the spread between the best and worst F1 Strings across 35 prompt configurations (7 table serializations x original, row-shuffled, column-shuffled, transposed and padded tables), averaged. 0-100, higher is more consistent; a model that fails every configuration also scores high.

Metric: Robustness (0-100). Source: crfm.stanford.edu. Saturation forecast: Estimated already saturated. 14 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScoreOverall rank
1Claude 3.5 Sonnet (20241022)80.19#302
2DeepSeek V378.21#329
3Llama 3.1 405B Instruct76.09#470
4Llama 3.1 70B Instruct75.87#567
5Qwen 2 72B Instruct75.34#579
6GPT-4o (2024-11-20)75.33#392
7GPT-4o Mini (2024-07-18)73.3#568
8Gemini 1.5 Flash (002)72.33#587
9Gemini 1.5 Pro (002)69.01#368
10Llama 3.1 8B Instruct66.83#1017
11Claude 3.5 Haiku (20241022)60.78#590
12Mistral 7B Instruct (v0.3)39.85#1255
13Mixtral 8x22B Instruct39.1#738
14Mixtral 8x7B Instruct28.81#1085

No result here: #3 Claude Opus 5.5, #6 GPT-6 Astra, #7 GPT-6.1 Sol.

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=helm-torr-wikitq-robustness · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-11-05.