HELM TORR - Tablebench Numerical Reasoning - Robustness: leaderboard

HELM ToRR (release v1.0.0) robustness on Tablebench Numerical Reasoning (TableBench numerical-reasoning questions; 73 instances): per instance, 1 minus the spread between the best and worst ROUGE-L across 35 prompt configurations (7 table serializations x original, row-shuffled, column-shuffled, transposed and padded tables), averaged. 0-100, higher is more consistent; a model that fails every configuration also scores high.

Metric: Robustness (0-100). Source: crfm.stanford.edu. 14 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScoreOverall rank
1Mistral 7B Instruct (v0.3)71.09#1255
2Llama 3.1 8B Instruct65.54#1017
3Mixtral 8x7B Instruct55.92#1085
4Qwen 2 72B Instruct55.4#579
5GPT-4o Mini (2024-07-18)54.92#568
6Gemini 1.5 Flash (002)54.45#587
7Claude 3.5 Haiku (20241022)54.07#590
8GPT-4o (2024-11-20)51.12#392
9Llama 3.1 405B Instruct50.7#470
10Gemini 1.5 Pro (002)50.65#368
11Mixtral 8x22B Instruct49.84#738
12Llama 3.1 70B Instruct49.2#567
13Claude 3.5 Sonnet (20241022)43.54#302
14DeepSeek V342.62#329

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=helm-torr-tablebench-numerical-reasoning-robustness · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-11-05.