HELM TORR - Tablebench Fact Checking - Robustness: leaderboard

HELM ToRR (release v1.0.0) robustness on Tablebench Fact Checking (TableBench fact-checking questions; 56 instances): per instance, 1 minus the spread between the best and worst ROUGE-L across 35 prompt configurations (7 table serializations x original, row-shuffled, column-shuffled, transposed and padded tables), averaged. 0-100, higher is more consistent; a model that fails every configuration also scores high.

Metric: Robustness (0-100). Source: crfm.stanford.edu. Saturation forecast: Estimated already saturated. 14 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScoreOverall rank
1Claude 3.5 Sonnet (20241022)60.22#302
2DeepSeek V359.75#329
3GPT-4o (2024-11-20)59.08#392
4Gemini 1.5 Pro (002)49.78#368
5Gemini 1.5 Flash (002)43.48#587
6Qwen 2 72B Instruct39.07#579
7Mixtral 8x22B Instruct33.48#738
8Claude 3.5 Haiku (20241022)32.88#590
9GPT-4o Mini (2024-07-18)32#568
10Llama 3.1 405B Instruct21.84#470
11Llama 3.1 70B Instruct19.54#567
12Mistral 7B Instruct (v0.3)18.92#1255
13Mixtral 8x7B Instruct18.15#1085
14Llama 3.1 8B Instruct9.85#1017

No result here: #3 Claude Opus 5.5, #6 GPT-6 Astra, #7 GPT-6.1 Sol.

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=helm-torr-tablebench-fact-checking-robustness · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-11-05.