HELM TORR - Fin Qa - Robustness: leaderboard

HELM ToRR (release v1.0.0) robustness on FinQA (numeric question answering over financial report tables; 56 instances): per instance, 1 minus the spread between the best and worst Program Accuracy across 35 prompt configurations (7 table serializations x original, row-shuffled, column-shuffled, transposed and padded tables), averaged. 0-100, higher is more consistent; a model that fails every configuration also scores high.

Metric: Robustness (0-100). Source: crfm.stanford.edu. Saturation forecast: Estimated already saturated. 14 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScoreOverall rank
1Llama 3.1 8B Instruct63#1017
2Gemini 1.5 Pro (002)59#368
3Gemini 1.5 Flash (002)57#587
4Claude 3.5 Sonnet (20241022)56#302
5GPT-4o (2024-11-20)55#392
6DeepSeek V351#329
7Mistral 7B Instruct (v0.3)51#1255
8Qwen 2 72B Instruct51#579
9Claude 3.5 Haiku (20241022)50#590
10Llama 3.1 70B Instruct49#567
11Mixtral 8x7B Instruct49#1085
12Llama 3.1 405B Instruct49#470
13GPT-4o Mini (2024-07-18)47#568
14Mixtral 8x22B Instruct47#738

No result here: #3 Claude Opus 5.5, #6 GPT-6 Astra, #7 GPT-6.1 Sol.

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=helm-torr-fin-qa-robustness · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-11-05.