Harvey LAB-AA - Litigation & Dispute Resolution: leaderboard

Artificial Analysis's implementation of Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark restricted to the Litigation & Dispute Resolution practice area (about five of its 120 private tasks): agents read case documents and draft legal deliverables graded criterion by criterion by an LLM judge. Share of rubric criteria passed, 0-100 (%); higher is better.

Metric: Criterion Pass Rate (%). Source: artificialanalysis.ai. Saturation forecast: Estimated already saturated. 28 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScoreOverall rank
1Muse Spark 1.3 (Max)97.37#31 (Muse Spark 1.3)
2Muse Wonder Full (Max)94.86#12 (Muse Wonder Full)
3Grok 4.7 (xHigh)94.36#26 (Grok 4.7)
4Gemini 4 Argon (High)94.24#9 (Gemini 4 Argon)
5GLM-5.3 (Max)93.98#44 (GLM-5.3)
6Muse Wonder (Max)93.98#18 (Muse Wonder)
7Kimi K3 (Max)93.73#35 (Kimi K3)
8Mistral Large 493.73#106
9DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Max)92.86#37 (DeepSeek V4.1 Flash)
10Claude Haiku 5.5 (Low)91.85#43 (Claude Haiku 5.5)
11GPT-6 Astra (Max)91.35#6 (GPT-6 Astra)
12Claude Haiku 5.5 (Max)91.23#43 (Claude Haiku 5.5)
13Gemini 3.8 Flash (High)90.85#30 (Gemini 3.8 Flash)
14Claude Haiku 5.5 (xHigh)90.85#43 (Claude Haiku 5.5)
15Claude Haiku 5.5 (Medium)90.35#43 (Claude Haiku 5.5)

No result here: #3 Claude Opus 5.5, #10 Claude Fable 5.1.

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=harvey-lab-aa-litigation-dispute-resolution · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-11-05.