Harvey LAB-AA - International Trade & Sanctions: leaderboard

Artificial Analysis's implementation of Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark restricted to the International Trade & Sanctions practice area (about five of its 120 private tasks): agents read case documents and draft legal deliverables graded criterion by criterion by an LLM judge. Share of rubric criteria passed, 0-100 (%); higher is better.

Metric: Criterion Pass Rate (%). Source: artificialanalysis.ai. Saturation forecast: Estimated already saturated. 28 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScoreOverall rank
1Muse Wonder Full (Max)96.41#12 (Muse Wonder Full)
2Muse Spark 1.3 (Max)96.28#31 (Muse Spark 1.3)
3GLM-5.3 (Max)94.02#44 (GLM-5.3)
4Grok 4.7 (xHigh)94.02#26 (Grok 4.7)
5Muse Wonder (Max)93.76#18 (Muse Wonder)
6DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Max)93.63#37 (DeepSeek V4.1 Flash)
7Kimi K3 (Max)93.36#35 (Kimi K3)
8Gemini 4 Argon (High)92.56#9 (Gemini 4 Argon)
9Mistral Large 492.3#106
10Claude Haiku 5.5 (Max)90.97#43 (Claude Haiku 5.5)
11Gemini 3.8 Flash (High)90.04#30 (Gemini 3.8 Flash)
12GPT-6 Astra (Max)89.77#6 (GPT-6 Astra)
13GPT-6.1 Sol (Max)89.51#7 (GPT-6.1 Sol)
14GLM-5.3 Flash88.45#77
15Claude Haiku 5.5 (Medium)88.45#43 (Claude Haiku 5.5)

No result here: #3 Claude Opus 5.5, #10 Claude Fable 5.1.

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=harvey-lab-aa-international-trade-sanctions · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-11-05.