Harvey LAB-AA - Intellectual Property: leaderboard

Artificial Analysis's implementation of Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark restricted to the Intellectual Property practice area (about five of its 120 private tasks): agents read case documents and draft legal deliverables graded criterion by criterion by an LLM judge. Share of rubric criteria passed, 0-100 (%); higher is better.

Metric: Criterion Pass Rate (%). Source: artificialanalysis.ai. Saturation forecast: Estimated already saturated. 28 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScoreOverall rank
1Gemini 4 Argon (High)97.98#9 (Gemini 4 Argon)
2Muse Wonder Full (Max)97.86#12 (Muse Wonder Full)
3Muse Spark 1.3 (Max)97.75#31 (Muse Spark 1.3)
4Muse Wonder (Max)97.51#18 (Muse Wonder)
5Kimi K3 (Max)96.2#35 (Kimi K3)
6GLM-5.3 (Max)96.2#44 (GLM-5.3)
7GLM-5.3 Flash96.09#77
8Mistral Large 495.49#106
9DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Max)95.26#37 (DeepSeek V4.1 Flash)
10GPT-6.1 Sol (Max)95.26#7 (GPT-6.1 Sol)
11Gemini 3.8 Flash (High)94.42#30 (Gemini 3.8 Flash)
12Claude Haiku 5.5 (Medium)93.71#43 (Claude Haiku 5.5)
13MiniMax-M393.48#151
14Grok 4.7 (xHigh)93.48#26 (Grok 4.7)
15Claude Haiku 5.5 (xHigh)93.48#43 (Claude Haiku 5.5)

No result here: #3 Claude Opus 5.5, #10 Claude Fable 5.1.

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=harvey-lab-aa-intellectual-property · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-11-05.