Harvey LAB-AA - Funds & Asset Management: leaderboard

Artificial Analysis's implementation of Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark restricted to the Funds & Asset Management practice area (about five of its 120 private tasks): agents read case documents and draft legal deliverables graded criterion by criterion by an LLM judge. Share of rubric criteria passed, 0-100 (%); higher is better.

Metric: Criterion Pass Rate (%). Source: artificialanalysis.ai. Saturation forecast: Around February 2027. 28 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScoreOverall rank
1Muse Wonder Full (Max)95.72#12 (Muse Wonder Full)
2Muse Spark 1.3 (Max)92.32#31 (Muse Spark 1.3)
3Muse Wonder (Max)92.13#18 (Muse Wonder)
4Gemini 4 Argon (High)91.74#9 (Gemini 4 Argon)
5Grok 4.7 (xHigh)90.48#26 (Grok 4.7)
6GLM-5.3 (Max)89.99#44 (GLM-5.3)
7GLM-5.3 Flash89.7#77
8DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Max)88.53#37 (DeepSeek V4.1 Flash)
9Kimi K3 (Max)88.34#35 (Kimi K3)
10GPT-6.1 Sol (Max)88.34#7 (GPT-6.1 Sol)
11Mistral Large 488.34#106
12Gemini 3.8 Flash (High)88.14#30 (Gemini 3.8 Flash)
13MiniMax-M387.56#151
14GPT-6 Astra (Max)87.46#6 (GPT-6 Astra)
15Claude Haiku 5.5 (High)85.62#43 (Claude Haiku 5.5)

No result here: #3 Claude Opus 5.5, #10 Claude Fable 5.1.

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=harvey-lab-aa-funds-asset-management · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-11-05.