Harvey LAB-AA - Energy & Natural Resources: leaderboard

Artificial Analysis's implementation of Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark restricted to the Energy & Natural Resources practice area (about five of its 120 private tasks): agents read case documents and draft legal deliverables graded criterion by criterion by an LLM judge. Share of rubric criteria passed, 0-100 (%); higher is better.

Metric: Criterion Pass Rate (%). Source: artificialanalysis.ai. Saturation forecast: Estimated already saturated. 28 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScoreOverall rank
1Kimi K3 (Max)98.35#35 (Kimi K3)
2Gemini 4 Argon (High)97.69#9 (Gemini 4 Argon)
3Muse Wonder (Max)97.58#18 (Muse Wonder)
4Mistral Large 497.36#106
5Muse Spark 1.3 (Max)97.36#31 (Muse Spark 1.3)
6Muse Wonder Full (Max)97.36#12 (Muse Wonder Full)
7Grok 4.7 (xHigh)97.25#26 (Grok 4.7)
8GLM-5.3 (Max)96.92#44 (GLM-5.3)
9DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Max)96.59#37 (DeepSeek V4.1 Flash)
10GPT-6.1 Sol (Max)95.27#7 (GPT-6.1 Sol)
11GLM-5.3 Flash94.83#77
12GPT-6 Astra (Max)94.72#6 (GPT-6 Astra)
13Gemini 3.8 Flash (High)94.5#30 (Gemini 3.8 Flash)
14GPT-6 Sol (Max)94.39#19 (GPT-6 Sol)
15GPT-6 Luna (Max)94.17#61 (GPT-6 Luna)

No result here: #3 Claude Opus 5.5, #10 Claude Fable 5.1.

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=harvey-lab-aa-energy-natural-resources · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-11-05.