Harvey LAB-AA - Employment & Labor: leaderboard

Artificial Analysis's implementation of Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark restricted to the Employment & Labor practice area (about five of its 120 private tasks): agents read case documents and draft legal deliverables graded criterion by criterion by an LLM judge. Share of rubric criteria passed, 0-100 (%); higher is better.

Metric: Criterion Pass Rate (%). Source: artificialanalysis.ai. Saturation forecast: Estimated already saturated. 28 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScoreOverall rank
1Muse Spark 1.3 (Max)93.63#31 (Muse Spark 1.3)
2Muse Wonder Full (Max)91.51#12 (Muse Wonder Full)
3Muse Wonder (Max)91.39#18 (Muse Wonder)
4DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Max)90.51#37 (DeepSeek V4.1 Flash)
5Gemini 4 Argon (High)89.39#9 (Gemini 4 Argon)
6Mistral Large 488.89#106
7GPT-6 Astra (Max)88.26#6 (GPT-6 Astra)
8Kimi K3 (Max)88.14#35 (Kimi K3)
9GLM-5.3 (Max)87.52#44 (GLM-5.3)
10Grok 4.7 (xHigh)87.52#26 (Grok 4.7)
11GLM-5.3 Flash85.52#77
12GPT-6.1 Sol (Max)85.39#7 (GPT-6.1 Sol)
13Claude Haiku 5.5 (Max)85.14#43 (Claude Haiku 5.5)
14Gemini 3.8 Flash (High)84.89#30 (Gemini 3.8 Flash)
15Claude Haiku 5.5 (High)84.52#43 (Claude Haiku 5.5)

No result here: #3 Claude Opus 5.5, #10 Claude Fable 5.1.

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=harvey-lab-aa-employment-labor · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-11-05.