Harvey LAB-AA - Capital Markets: leaderboard

Artificial Analysis's implementation of Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark restricted to the Capital Markets practice area (about five of its 120 private tasks): agents read case documents and draft legal deliverables graded criterion by criterion by an LLM judge. Share of rubric criteria passed, 0-100 (%); higher is better.

Metric: Criterion Pass Rate (%). Source: artificialanalysis.ai. Saturation forecast: Estimated already saturated. 28 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScoreOverall rank
1Muse Spark 1.3 (Max)97.65#31 (Muse Spark 1.3)
2Muse Wonder Full (Max)96.86#12 (Muse Wonder Full)
3GPT-6.1 Sol (Max)96.47#7 (GPT-6.1 Sol)
4GPT-6 Astra (Max)95.95#6 (GPT-6 Astra)
5Muse Wonder (Max)95.69#18 (Muse Wonder)
6Mistral Large 495.42#106
7Grok 4.7 (xHigh)95.42#26 (Grok 4.7)
8Gemini 4 Argon (High)95.16#9 (Gemini 4 Argon)
9Claude Haiku 5.5 (Max)94.77#43 (Claude Haiku 5.5)
10Gemini 3.8 Flash (High)94.51#30 (Gemini 3.8 Flash)
11GLM-5.3 Flash94.38#77
12DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Max)94.12#37 (DeepSeek V4.1 Flash)
13Claude Haiku 5.5 (High)93.99#43 (Claude Haiku 5.5)
14Claude Haiku 5.5 (Low)93.99#43 (Claude Haiku 5.5)
15Claude Haiku 5.5 (Medium)93.86#43 (Claude Haiku 5.5)

No result here: #3 Claude Opus 5.5, #10 Claude Fable 5.1.

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=harvey-lab-aa-capital-markets · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-11-05.