Harvey LAB-AA - Banking & Finance: leaderboard

Artificial Analysis's implementation of Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark restricted to the Banking & Finance practice area (about five of its 120 private tasks): agents read case documents and draft legal deliverables graded criterion by criterion by an LLM judge. Share of rubric criteria passed, 0-100 (%); higher is better.

Metric: Criterion Pass Rate (%). Source: artificialanalysis.ai. Saturation forecast: Estimated already saturated. 28 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScoreOverall rank
1Muse Spark 1.3 (Max)97.64#31 (Muse Spark 1.3)
2Gemini 4 Argon (High)97.01#9 (Gemini 4 Argon)
3Muse Wonder (Max)97.01#18 (Muse Wonder)
4Muse Wonder Full (Max)96.64#12 (Muse Wonder Full)
5Grok 4.7 (xHigh)95.4#26 (Grok 4.7)
6Mistral Large 495.27#106
7Kimi K3 (Max)94.9#35 (Kimi K3)
8GPT-6 Astra (Max)94.15#6 (GPT-6 Astra)
9GPT-6.1 Sol (Max)93.91#7 (GPT-6.1 Sol)
10GLM-5.3 (Max)93.66#44 (GLM-5.3)
11GLM-5.3 Flash93.28#77
12Gemini 3.8 Flash (High)92.41#30 (Gemini 3.8 Flash)
13DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Max)92.04#37 (DeepSeek V4.1 Flash)
14Claude Haiku 5.5 (High)91.29#43 (Claude Haiku 5.5)
15Claude Haiku 5.5 (Medium)91.29#43 (Claude Haiku 5.5)

No result here: #3 Claude Opus 5.5, #10 Claude Fable 5.1.

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=harvey-lab-aa-banking-finance · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-11-05.