Harvey LAB-AA - Antitrust & Competition: leaderboard

Artificial Analysis's implementation of Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark restricted to the Antitrust & Competition practice area (about five of its 120 private tasks): agents read case documents and draft legal deliverables graded criterion by criterion by an LLM judge. Share of rubric criteria passed, 0-100 (%); higher is better.

Metric: Criterion Pass Rate (%). Source: artificialanalysis.ai. Saturation forecast: Estimated already saturated. 28 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScoreOverall rank
1Gemini 4 Argon (High)95.29#9 (Gemini 4 Argon)
2Muse Spark 1.3 (Max)95.17#31 (Muse Spark 1.3)
3Muse Wonder (Max)94.81#18 (Muse Wonder)
4DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Max)94.2#37 (DeepSeek V4.1 Flash)
5Muse Wonder Full (Max)93.6#12 (Muse Wonder Full)
6GLM-5.3 (Max)93.12#44 (GLM-5.3)
7Grok 4.7 (xHigh)93.12#26 (Grok 4.7)
8Mistral Large 492.63#106
9GLM-5.3 Flash92.39#77
10Kimi K3 (Max)91.67#35 (Kimi K3)
11MiniMax-M390.7#151
12Gemini 3.8 Flash (High)88.77#30 (Gemini 3.8 Flash)
13GPT-6.1 Sol (Max)88.77#7 (GPT-6.1 Sol)
14GPT-6 Astra (Max)87.32#6 (GPT-6 Astra)
15Claude Haiku 5.5 (Max)85.51#43 (Claude Haiku 5.5)

No result here: #3 Claude Opus 5.5, #10 Claude Fable 5.1.

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=harvey-lab-aa-antitrust-competition · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-11-05.