HarmVideoBench - Clip-Internal Meaning: leaderboard

HarmVideoBench (2026) asks multimodal models four-option questions about 1,379 real harmful videos at three levels of understanding; API models watch the video with audio and open models see 12 key frames with the transcript. This board is accuracy in percent on questions about the meaning implied within the clip; chance is 25 and higher is better.

Metric: Clip-Internal Meaning accuracy (%) on four-option multiple-choice questions about 1,379 real harmful videos (one question per video per level), temperature 0 greedy decoding; API models take the video and audio natively, open models 12 sampled key frames plus the transcript; chance 25; questions about the implied meaning within the clip; higher is better. Source: arxiv.org. Saturation forecast: Around February 2027. 19 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScoreOverall rank
1Gemini 3.1 Pro (Preview)84.6#94
2GPT-5.583.4#49
3Claude Opus 4.782.9#79
4Qwen 3 VL 235B A22B (Thinking)82.6#451
5Claude Sonnet 4.682.5#161
6Qwen 3 VL 235B A22B Instruct82.3#522
7Qwen 3 VL 32B (Thinking)82.1#559
8Qwen 3 VL 32B Instruct81.6#585
9Qwen 3 VL 30B A3B (Thinking)81.4#712
10Qwen 3 VL 8B (Thinking)79.4#887
11Qwen 3 VL 30B A3B Instruct78.9#871
12MiniCPM-V-4.672.4#3525
13LFM2.5-VL-1.6B69.3#3872
14GLM-4.5V (Non-reasoning)67.8#744 (GLM-4.5V)
15Qwen 3 VL 8B Instruct63.7#981

No result here: #1 Claude Fable 5.2, #2 Gemini 4 Carbon, #5 Claude Opus 5.5.

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=harmvideobench-clip-internal-meaning · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-11-13.