HarmVideoBench: leaderboard

Large vision-language models (LVLMs) have recently shown immense potential in automated content moderation, sparking growing interest in developing harmful-video benchmarks. However, we identify two primary limitations in existing works: 1) The multi-layered characteristics of harmful videos are overlooked. Existing benchmarks predominantly formulate evaluation as a binary classification task, fai

Metric: Macro Avg. (self-reported). Source: benchmarklist.com. Saturation forecast: Around June 2027. 21 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScoreOverall rank
1Gemini 3.1 Pro (Preview)82.1#58
2GPT-5.580.9#31
3Claude Opus 4.780.3#49
4Qwen 3 VL 235B A22B (Thinking)80.1#238 (Qwen 3 VL 235B A22B)
5Claude Sonnet 4.679.9#90
6Qwen 3 VL 235B A22B Instruct79.7#273
7Qwen 3 VL 32B (Thinking)79.6#294 (Qwen 3 VL 32B)
8Qwen 3 VL 32B Instruct79#283
9Qwen 3 VL 30B A3B (Thinking)78.9#351 (Qwen 3 VL 30B A3B)
10Qwen 3 VL 8B (Thinking)76.7
11Qwen 3 VL 30B A3B Instruct76.3#384
12LFM2.5-VL-1.6B66.8#854
13GLM-4.5V65.5#346
14Qwen 3 VL 8B Instruct61.7#420

No result here: #3 Claude Opus 5.5, #6 GPT-6 Astra, #7 GPT-6.1 Sol.

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=harmvideobench · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-10-20.