HardSecBench - Single Attempt@1 - Functional: leaderboard

Measures functional and security requirement pass rates on 924 hardware/firmware tasks. Single-attempt permits up to three compiler-only repairs. Refinement uses GPT-5.1 functional-only collaborator feedback for up to five iterations. Pass@k averages atomic requirements, not whole-task success. Security hints are absent in this main evaluation. Model effort and dated labels are retained. This series reports HardSecBench - Single Attempt@1 - Functional using Requirement Pass Rate (%).

Metric: Requirement Pass Rate (%). Source: arxiv.org. Saturation forecast: Estimated already saturated. 18 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScoreOverall rank
1Gemini 3 Pro (Preview)93.93#71
2Claude Opus 4.591.72#87
3GPT-5.1 (Medium)91.68#145 (GPT-5.1)
4Gemini 2.5 Pro91.43#159
5GPT-5 (Medium)91.35#105 (GPT-5)
6Gemini 2.5 Flash89.85#255
7O189.15#190
8GPT-OSS-120B88.64#346
9Kimi K2 090588.53#292
10Claude Sonnet 4.587.86#148
11GLM-4.686.18#265
12DeepSeek V3.285.33#210
13Qwen 3 Coder 480B A35B85.2#286
14Llama 4 Maverick Instruct84.72#467
15Qwen 3 Max84.13#213

No result here: #3 Claude Opus 5.5, #6 GPT-6 Astra, #7 GPT-6.1 Sol.

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=hardsecbench-single-attempt-1-functional · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-11-05.