HardMTBench: leaderboard

General-purpose machine translation benchmarks such as FLORES-200 have reached a saturation regime on Chinese-English pairs, where modern large language models cluster within a narrow band of high scores. Across 22 systems, FLORES-200 zh-en GEMBA scores fall in a 7.87-point range with a standard deviation of 2.29, which compresses the separation between systems on knowledge-intensive domains such

Metric: HardMTBench zh-en GEMBA-DA (self-reported). Source: benchmarklist.com. Saturation forecast: Around June 2027. 22 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScoreOverall rank
1GPT-5.591.4#31
2GPT-5.5 (Non-reasoning)91.27#31 (GPT-5.5)
3DeepSeek V4 Pro90.91#102
4Qwen 3.6 35B A3B90.68#226
5Qwen 3.5 397B A17B (Non-reasoning)90.66#146 (Qwen 3.5 397B A17B)
6Gemma 4 31B90.62#200
7DeepSeek V4 Pro (Non-reasoning)90.59#102 (DeepSeek V4 Pro)
8Qwen 3.5 397B A17B90.47#146
9Gemini 3.1 Pro (Preview)90.24#58
10Gemma 4 26B A4B89.65#358
11Gemma 4 31B (Non-reasoning)89.3#200 (Gemma 4 31B)
12Qwen 3.6 35B A3B (Non-reasoning)89.03#226 (Qwen 3.6 35B A3B)
13Hy-MT2-30B-A3B88.6#359
14Gemma 4 26B A4B (Non-reasoning)87.82#358 (Gemma 4 26B A4B)
15Gemma 4 E4B82.69#767

No result here: #3 Claude Opus 5.5, #6 GPT-6 Astra, #7 GPT-6.1 Sol.

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=hardmtbench · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-10-20.