Hard12: leaderboard

Single models in a coding harness attempt 12 hard, hand-checked tasks drawn from Terminal-Bench 4, DeepSWE, SWE-rebench, SWE-bench Pro V2 and Longtail-SWE, three runs each; the score is the share of the 36 runs solved. Unlike those source benchmarks it is one person's hand-picked hard subset, and the same page's multi-model setups are not admitted.

Metric: pass@1: mean solve rate over 12 hard coding tasks x 3 runs (%). Source: ibragim.dev. Saturation forecast: Around February 2027. 17 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScoreOverall rank
1GPT-6.1 Terra (Medium)83.3#20 (GPT-6.1 Terra)
2Claude Opus 5.5 (Medium)83.3#5 (Claude Opus 5.5)
3GPT-6.1 Sol (High)80.6#10 (GPT-6.1 Sol)
4GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium)80.6#10 (GPT-6.1 Sol)
5Kimi K3.1 Pro75#29
6GPT-6.1 Sol (Low)72.2#10 (GPT-6.1 Sol)
7DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (1017)63.9#39
8Claude Opus 5.5 (Low)63.9#5 (Claude Opus 5.5)
9Kimi K361.1#54
10GPT-6 Luna61.1#95
11Claude Haiku 5.550#65
12DeepSeek V4.1 Flash44.4#59
13Qwen 3.8 27B19.4#204
14DeepSeek V4 Flash (0731)16.7#139
15Beam 1.011.1#199

No result here: #1 Claude Fable 5.2, #2 Gemini 4 Carbon, #6 GPT-6 Astra.

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=hard12 · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-11-13.