GroupToM-Bench - Desire: leaderboard

GroupToM-Bench (2026) tests group-level theory of mind in multimodal models: 240 expert-seeded multi-agent scenarios, each a scene image with dialogue, are probed along a seven-level audit from individual mental states to collective outcomes. This board is level 2 desire inference. Scored by strict exact-match accuracy in percent on multi-select multiple choice (random 6.7); higher is better.

Metric: strict exact-match accuracy (%) over multi-select options (random 6.7) on Level 2 desire inference (latent psychological motives behind stated goals), multiple choice; 240 multimodal multi-agent scenarios (scene image plus dialogue); higher is better. Source: arxiv.org. Saturation forecast: Around February 2027. 11 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScoreOverall rank
1Gemini 3 Pro77.1#137
2GPT-4o75.3#741
3GPT-574.1#167
4Claude Haiku 4.573.2#568
5GPT-5 Mini70.3#348
6GPT-5 Nano64.8#889
7Llama 3.2 11B62.5#6383
8Qwen 2.5 VL 7B Instruct58.2#1833
9Qwen 2 VL 7B54.9#2261

No result here: #1 Claude Fable 5.2, #2 Gemini 4 Carbon, #5 Claude Opus 5.5.

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=grouptom-bench-desire · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-11-13.