GR-Ben (Thinking): leaderboard

Metric: Average F1 (%) over the nine GR-Ben subsets (four scientific: biology, physics, chemistry and computer science from MMLU-Pro; five logical: abductive, analogical, mixed-form, deductive and inductive), F1 being the harmonic mean of the accuracy on flawed solutions (earliest erroneous step named) and on fully correct solutions; LLMs prompted as critics with slow thinking enabled (GPT-5.2 at xhigh and Gemini 3 Flash at high reasoning effort, 32,768 output tokens); higher is better. Source: arxiv.org. Saturation forecast: Around September 2028. 7 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScore
1Gemini 3 Flash (High)61.1
2DeepSeek V3.2 (Thinking)56.7
3GPT-5.2 (xHigh)54.9
4Qwen 3 32B45.4
5Qwen 3 14B42.3
6Qwen 3 8B39.8
7Qwen 3 4B32.5

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=gr-ben-thinking · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-10-07.