GISA - Table EM: leaderboard

Metric: Exact match (%) on the 253 table-type queries (a table with a predefined schema, every cell right); GISA's human-written information-seeking queries with deterministic answers (normalized TSV output compared cell by cell); LLMs run as ReAct agents with Google search (Serper) and Jina browse tools whose pages the same model summarizes, at most 30 tool calls and 8,192 output tokens per step, while commercial search systems run as offered; higher is better. Source: arxiv.org. Saturation forecast: Around 2030. 16 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScoreOverall rank
1Claude Sonnet 4.5 (Thinking)13.04#138 (Claude Sonnet 4.5)
2Qwen 3 Max (Thinking)10.67#201 (Qwen 3 Max)
3Claude Sonnet 4.59.49#138
4GPT-5.2 (Thinking)9.49#105 (GPT-5.2)
5Gemini 3 Pro (High)8.7#77 (Gemini 3 Pro)
6GLM-4.7 (Thinking)8.3#185 (GLM-4.7)
7Kimi K2.5 (Thinking)7.91#139 (Kimi K2.5)
8Gemini 3 Pro (Low)7.11#77 (Gemini 3 Pro)
9DeepSeek V3.2 (Non-reasoning)6.72#198 (DeepSeek V3.2)
10DeepSeek V3.2 (Thinking)6.32#198 (DeepSeek V3.2)
11GPT-4o Search Preview4.74#445
12Qwen 3 235B A22B (Thinking)4.35#304 (Qwen 3 235B A22B)
13O4 Mini Deep Research3.56#219

No result here: #3 Claude Opus 5.5, #5 GPT-6 Astra, #8 Claude Fable 5.1.

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=gisa-table-em · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-10-11.