GISA - List EM: leaderboard

Metric: Exact match (%) on the 48 list-type queries (an ordered list, content and order right); GISA's human-written information-seeking queries with deterministic answers (normalized TSV output compared cell by cell); LLMs run as ReAct agents with Google search (Serper) and Jina browse tools whose pages the same model summarizes, at most 30 tool calls and 8,192 output tokens per step, while commercial search systems run as offered; higher is better. Source: arxiv.org. Saturation forecast: Around 2029. 16 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScoreOverall rank
1Gemini 3 Pro (High)27.08#77 (Gemini 3 Pro)
2Gemini 3 Pro (Low)27.08#77 (Gemini 3 Pro)
3Qwen 3 Max (Thinking)25#201 (Qwen 3 Max)
4Claude Sonnet 4.522.92#138
5Claude Sonnet 4.5 (Thinking)22.92#138 (Claude Sonnet 4.5)
6DeepSeek V3.2 (Non-reasoning)22.92#198 (DeepSeek V3.2)
7DeepSeek V3.2 (Thinking)20.83#198 (DeepSeek V3.2)
8GLM-4.7 (Thinking)20.83#185 (GLM-4.7)
9Kimi K2.5 (Thinking)18.75#139 (Kimi K2.5)
10O4 Mini Deep Research18.75#219
11GPT-5.2 (Thinking)16.67#105 (GPT-5.2)
12Qwen 3 235B A22B (Thinking)14.58#304 (Qwen 3 235B A22B)
13GPT-4o Search Preview8.33#445

No result here: #3 Claude Opus 5.5, #5 GPT-6 Astra, #8 Claude Fable 5.1.

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=gisa-list-em · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-10-11.