GB/T-Bench - Diagnosis Recall - Normative References: leaderboard

GB/T-Bench (arXiv 2608.06312v1): review of 488 Chinese national standard documents seeded with 7,306 errors across 25 error types, by direct LLM review without the authors' multi-agent reviewer. Exact diagnosis recall for errors in the normative-reference review dimension, which needs cross-section and cited-standard checks, percent (Table 3). Higher is better.

Metric: Diagnosis recall (%; exact section, dimension and error-type match). Source: arxiv.org. 14 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScoreOverall rank
1Qwen 2.5 VL 72B Instruct60.4#383
2GPT-5.4 Mini48.28#228
3GPT-5.543.89#33
4Qwen 3 235B A22B 2507 Instruct43.47#315
5DeepSeek V4 Flash43.16#155
6Claude Fable 542.86#20
7Qwen 3.7 Plus42.84#98
8GPT-5.439.6#83
9DeepSeek V4 Pro39.39#112
10Gemini 3.5 Flash38.35#66
11Claude Opus 4.836.57#39
12GPT-5.6 Sol34.07#22
13GPT-5.333.02#104
14MiniMax-M2.731.77#270

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=gb-t-bench-diagnosis-recall-normative-references · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-11-05.