GameLogicBench - Combo: leaderboard

The Combo tier of GameLogicBench (Che et al., 2026): 28 tasks that combine several gameplay mechanics, where correctness depends on their interaction in time, in space and under concurrent calls. Solve rate in percent from tick-level state assertions, one sample per model and scaffold at high effort; higher is better.

Metric: Solve rate (%; the 28 Combo tasks (several interacting mechanics); one sample per model-scaffold configuration with effort=high, a 3,600 s limit and network egress sealed; a task counts as solved only if the submitted Godot 4.4 project passes every tick-level state assertion in every judge-selected scenario and seed). Source: arxiv.org. Saturation forecast: Around July 2027. 20 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScoreOverall rank
1Claude Opus 5 (High)53.57#20 (Claude Opus 5)
2Qwen 3.8 Max (High)50#55 (Qwen 3.8 Max)
3Kimi K3 (High)42.86#53 (Kimi K3)
4DeepSeek V4 Pro (0813) (High)39.29#81 (DeepSeek V4 Pro (0813))
5GPT-5.6 Sol (High)35.71#29 (GPT-5.6 Sol)
6GLM-5.2 (High)32.14#137 (GLM-5.2)
7DeepSeek V4 Flash (0731) (High)32.14#136 (DeepSeek V4 Flash (0731))
8DeepSeek V4 Pro (High)28.57#181 (DeepSeek V4 Pro)
9GPT-5.6 Terra (High)25#60 (GPT-5.6 Terra)
10Claude Sonnet 5 (High)21.43#108 (Claude Sonnet 5)
11MiniMax-M3 (High)17.86#265 (MiniMax-M3)
12DeepSeek V4 Flash (High)14.29#254 (DeepSeek V4 Flash)

No result here: #1 Claude Fable 5.2, #2 Gemini 4 Carbon, #5 Claude Opus 5.5.

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=gamelogicbench-combo · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-11-12.