G-IdiomAlign - Multiple-Choice Equivalence - English Targets: leaderboard

G-IdiomAlign (Ye et al., 2026) multiple-choice idiom equivalence over the 8 directions whose target language is English. Given a source idiom, the model picks the meaning-equivalent target-language idiom among four options whose three distractors are a literal translation, a lexical look-alike and a contextually associated idiom; accuracy in percent (higher is better), macro-averaged over the directions.

Metric: Accuracy (%; source idiom to its meaning-equivalent target-language idiom among four options, the other three typed distractors (literal translation, lexical cue, contextual association), greedy decoding; macro-average over the 8 directions into English). Source: arxiv.org. Saturation forecast: Around February 2027. 7 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScoreOverall rank
1DeepSeek V3.2 (Thinking)66.7#403 (DeepSeek V3.2)
2Gemini 2.5 Pro66.53#262
3DeepSeek V3.2 (Non-reasoning)57.84#403 (DeepSeek V3.2)
4Claude Haiku 4.555.54#568
5Qwen 3 8B (Thinking)39.57#1838 (Qwen 3 8B)
6Qwen 3 8B (Non-reasoning)33.95#1838 (Qwen 3 8B)
7Ministral-8B-Instruct-241030.29#4720

No result here: #1 Claude Fable 5.2, #2 Gemini 4 Carbon, #5 Claude Opus 5.5.

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=g-idiomalign-multiple-choice-equivalence-english-targets · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-11-12.